The National Council for Human Rights – Syria is an independent, non-governmental
Strategic Deception Document (Alternative masks)
“Syria is between the entitlement to national stability and the trap of functional systems: A strategic vision to dismantle the structure of extremism and protect national, regional and international security”
Policy introduction (Executive Summary):
This document aims to provide a strategic and in-depth analysis of the structural and ideological structure that governs the Syrian capital, Damascus, at the current stage. The document goes beyond monitoring daily violations to reveal... “Deception system” Which uses civil and secular facades as masks to pass a radical agenda linked to the Muslim Brotherhood organization and extremist regional axes..
The basic principles of the document:
• Facade exposure: Revealing the structural contradiction between a discourse “Ahmed Al-Sharaa” Civil and ideological field practice.
• Deconstructing the crime: Linking criminal violations (Kidnapping, plundering, royalties 7%) Funding the radical system.
• Security warning: Proving that the continuation of this system represents a direct threat to energy security, international trade corridors, and civil peace in neighboring countries..
• The national alternative: Put forward the features of the independent path that rejects “Alternative masks” It adheres to the state of law and institutions.
Notice to international bodies:
This document is not just a human rights report; “Early warning” For the active forces; Betting on “restoration” Failed system or acceptance “Borrowed interfaces” It will reproduce extremism in more complex forms, making the next societal explosion inevitable and crossing the Syrian borders.
The first axis: The impossibility of reform in a radical environment: to fail “Individual experience” The belief system collapses
Strategic introduction:
Field and political facts prove that the attempt to present... “a personality” As a facade for reform or stability within a system governed by “Extremist religious and intellectual agendas” It is an experiment doomed to failure. The structural contradiction between “Civil interface” The Brotherhood’s radical depth led to complete paralysis of state institutions, which negatively affected local and regional stability, and embarrassed international parties that bet on this model as a compromise solution..
- “Brotherhood encirclement” And the paralysis of sovereign decision-making:
• Shadow ideological authority: The real operational tools were not in hand “Sharia”; Rather, he remained surrounded by an extremist system that adopted an ideology “The Muslim Brotherhood” In the aspects of education, judiciary and society. This encirclement made any attempt at a political solution abstract “Ink on paper”The cross-border religious agenda remains the actual driver of the field and the decision-making compass.
• Failure of the individual experiment: If he puts “the person” He comes from a jihadist background in an intellectual and practical environment hostile to the international trends and commitments required of him “Structural failure” deterministic Extremism in Damascus was not just a temporary phenomenon; “The ruling system” itself, which swallows up any attempt to deviate from the context of extremism and dependence. - Engineering extremism: transformation “State” to “Ideological incubator”:
• Rehabilitation of the land against civil and civil curricula: Instead of building a state of citizenship, the system sought... (With its Brotherhood engine) To poison educational curricula and trap children’s minds with exclusionary thinking. Target this thought “woman” As a weakest link to transform it from a civil partner into a victim of the extremist religious agenda that protects the survival of power.
• industry “The extreme generation” (Field guides): Young Minds were targeted to instill exclusionary and jihadist ideology with the aim of tearing apart Syrian society and serving a future regional plan.
• Documentary example: activity “Holy Revelation Foundation” Which manages more than 75 branch, and its video recordings are widespread documenting the operations of recruiting children and brainwashing them.
• Military penetration: Monitoring the processes of youth volunteering in the army by making arrangements “Brotherhood” directly, and subject them to “Sharia courses” An ideology aimed at loyalty to thought, not loyalty to the nation.
• Incitement and deliberate silence: It was not the system “Helpless” About controlling extremism, indeed it was “Beneficiary” from him; Where societal incitement was allowed and the seeds of division were spread to prevent it from arising “A unified national movement”. The system deliberately deepened hate speech, contenting itself with formal rejection and media statements marketed abroad, without taking any actual legal or executive action to combat this expansion.. - International reflection: A bet falls “Who brought it?”:
• Burning of international papers: The failure of this experiment did not stop at the Syrian borders, but rather was reflected in... “Strategic failure” On the international and regional bodies that tried to market this model. Reality has proven that the extremist system does not accept partnership, and that betting on... “People” Without change “Intellectual and methodological structure” It is a losing gamble that has embarrassed its allies.
• Regional risk: Syria was transformed by this radical ideology surrounded by the Brotherhood “A potential partner in peace” to “A platform for exporting ideological chaos” and security, which has become a direct threat to the security and stability of neighboring countries and the entire region
The second axis: Systematic violations and undermining civil peace (from “organized crime” to “Existential oppression”)
Strategic introduction:
This section monitors the moral and legal fall of the Damascus system by documenting a series of crimes and violations that targeted Syrian components in sensitive geographical areas. (From the coast to As-Suwayda and the rest of the Syrian regions). The system’s inability to protect citizens, and the direct involvement of its agencies in these violations, prove that it has turned into... “Intimidating authority” It lacks the minimum requirements of a state guaranteeing security.
- War crimes and crimes against humanity (According to international reports):
• International documentation: Based on the reports of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, systematic patterns of killing, arbitrary detention and forced displacement have been documented..
• The coast and Suwayda: These areas turned into fields for “Collective punishment”; Organized crime is used as a political tool to break the will of society and domesticate the popular incubator under the weight of an existential threat.
.The report of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom and its recommendation to classify Syria as a dangerous country due to its crimes against minorities - strategy “Kidnapping and extortion” (Funding the militias with blood):
• Systematic kidnapping: Documenting the escalation in kidnappings of civilians (Women and palace) In the system's areas of influence. These processes are managed as “A bloody economic system” To finance the militias linked to the authority by demanding exorbitant financial ransoms.
• Organic complicity and international recognition:
• a report “New York Times” (The New York Times): We rely fundamentally on what was revealed by the American newspaper’s recent investigation, which documented with material evidence the involvement of networks linked to the system in kidnappings and cross-border extortion, which gives the case an international criminal dimension that cannot be refuted..
• investigation “Coast kidnappers”: The silence of the security services regarding the kidnapping networks known by name and association proves organic complicity.
• Physical evidence: The documentation we have of dozens of names responsible for these operations puts the system in a position “Offending party” No judgment. - Targeting “Authentic ingredients” And the dismantling of Christian existence:
• Silent displacement and intimidation: Monitoring policies of systematic restrictions through economic pressure and security intimidation, up to... “Breaking down shops and homes” To push Christian competencies towards forced migration, which undermines the claim “Protection of minorities”.
• Conclusive facts: The recent attacks in Al-Suqaylabiyah in the Hama countryside, the church bombing incident in Damascus, the individual and systematic violations that affected places of worship, and the imposition of... “The lawsuit and extremist ideological discourse” Within areas with Christian specificity.
• Seizure of property: Documenting cases of seizure of real estate and private property under the cover of unjust laws, aimed at changing societal demographics and emptying areas of their original inhabitants for the benefit of... “Functional class” and extreme axes. - Field violations: From the coast to Suwayda:
• Suppression of the popular movement: Documenting the violations that affected the peaceful movement in Suwayda, and using tools “Intellectual and security intimidation” And assassinating activists to strike any voice demanding dignity and livelihood.
• Insulting the babysitter (The coast): Monitoring cases of humiliation and humiliation to which the people of the Syrian coast are exposed at checkpoints and in official circles, and turning their sacrifices into “fuel” To maintain a system that only protects its interests, which has led to a state of suppressed popular unrest that threatens an imminent societal explosion.. - Criminal dismantling of individual violations:
• Torture and arbitrary detention: The continued practices of forced disappearance and systematic torture within the security branches surrounding the decision-making process in Damascus. These practices prove that “Extremist system” What we dismantled in the first axis is that which manages the security scene with a vindictive mentality that is outside any legal or ethical framework.
The third axis: The play of accountability and formal justice (Falsifying rights to prolong impunity)
Strategic introduction:
This axis monitors the attempts of a system “Sharia” Misleading international public opinion by adopting a rhetoric “Formal accounting” presentation “Procedural peels” Suggests reform. This “Formal justice” It does not aim to do justice to the victims, but rather is designed to provide a legal cover for the continuation of organized crime, and to whitewash those involved in major violations. (Murder, kidnapping, plunder, and systematic starvation). - “The facade district”: Show trials and acquittal of perpetrators:
• Falsifying accounting: Documenting the system’s resort to secret or sham internal trials “Scapegoats” They are secondary figures, while they remain the real leaders of the networks of murder, kidnapping and plunder (Those supported directly by the family and extremist axes) They are immune and above any law.
• Emptying the law of its content: Use the Ministry of Justice (Ideological jihadist thought) To issue “Patent documents” To actual criminals by manipulating legal materials, which turns the judiciary into “Legal laundry” For criminal and political crimes committed under the auspices of the authority. - Targeting “Transitional justice” And the file of missing persons was booby-trapped:
• Tampering with the missing persons file: Use file “Forcibly disappeared people” And the casualty numbers are as “Political barter paper” In international negotiations, without providing real disclosures or acknowledging criminal responsibility, which perpetuates the continuation of the crime.
• The impossibility of justice under “Encirclement”: Proving that transitional justice requires complete judicial independence, which is technically impossible in light of a system surrounded by... “The thought of the Muslim Brotherhood” And the agendas of the axes that see true accountability as an existential threat to their structure. - Misleading the international community “Cartoon committees”:
• Fake investigation committees: Monitoring the formation of formal investigation committees following each major crime (Such as the kidnapping incidents in Suwayda or the office burning incident in Damascus), which ends exclusively with “Restricting the crime against an unknown person” Or assign responsibility to fictitious third parties. These committees are a tool for “Absorbing popular anger” It is not a tool for revealing facts.
• Buying time through the Brotherhood machine: Exposing a role “Secular facades” The hired worker who works within the Brotherhood machine abroad (London and Washington) To promote these judicial plays. These campaigns aim to convince Western capitals of the existence of... “Reform path” Imaginary, to obstruct the imposition of new international sanctions or prevent real prosecutions against the heads of the system. - Strategic linkage: Justice as “decor” To continue:
• The system violates private property (The royalty 7%) It targets the right to life through systematic kidnapping. It cannot be a sponsor of justice. True justice begins with deconstruction “Functional system” And hold its leaders accountable, not through it “Legal frills” It gives killers a chance to continue under new, misleading names.
We warn the international community not to be deceived by “Legal language” Which Damascus began using recently. that it “Formal justice” Designed in intelligence rooms with the aim of aborting true international accountability. Any recognition of these plays represents a clear betrayal of the victims, and an encouragement for the system to continue its criminal approach surrounded by extremism and dependence on foreign countries.
Fourth axis: The economy of intimidation and ideological barter (Destruction of the investment environment and rampant family plunder)
Strategic introduction:
This axis reveals the impossibility of any sustainable economic or investment activity under its system of control “Militia mentality” And encircle it “Ideological agendas”. The absence of legal security, and the replacement of civil judiciary with authorities “Jihadist law” Hidden, it has made Syria an environment that repels capital and a platform for systematic plunder and extortion, which threatens any regional energy or development projects.. - Lack of legal security and”Idolization” Ministry of Justice:
• The penetration of radical thought: Monitoring the transformation of the judicial institution and the Ministry of Justice into a tool to serve the extremist agenda, where commercial disputes are managed with references “Jihadist law” And narrow interests that have nothing to do with civil law.
• Traps of formal laws: Proof that the stated investment laws are “Legal cover” To attract money, while being circumvented by superior security decisions that confiscate investors’ rights and prevent the transfer of profits. - Institutionalizing plunder: “Economics of lineage” And the royalty 7%:
• Family loyalty tax: Documentation of imposing a fixed rate of up to 7% (Family ratio) The profits of major projects are forcibly extracted for the benefit of the narrow circle of the system.
• Forced partners: Force investors to accept “Imaginary partners” From the regime's relatives or their agents, which turned the Syrian economy into... “Family fiefdom” It is run with a mafia mentality, not the state.
• Million-dollar bribery system: Bribery turned into “Operating system” (Operating System) في كافة دوائر الدولة، مما يرفع تكلفة الاستثمار ويجعله مستحيلاً لأي جهة تلتزم بمعايير النزاهة الدولية. - الإرهاب الميداني ضد المستثمرين (واقعة حرق المكتب بدمشق):
• رسائل النار: استخدام أسلوب “Intentional sabotage” (As happened in the incident of burning the office in Damascus) As a means of political and security intimidation for those who refuse to pay bribes or give up lineage.
• Lack of accountability: وقوع هذه الجرائم في قلب العاصمة دون أي ملاحقة يثبت أن أجهزة الدولة هي التي توفر الغطاء القانوني لـ “المخربين” التابعين للمنظومة. - الانفلات الأمني والسطو تحت ذرائع “patriotism”:
• بيئة “عالية المخاطر”: Security chaos (Kidnapping, looting, lack of rule of law) It is directly reflected in oil, gas and energy investments.
• Systematic looting: Monitoring cases of robbery of economic establishments under pretext “National contribution”، مما أدى لهروب الكتلة الصناعية والتجارية السورية نحو دول الجوار. - Strategic warning: أمن الطاقة والاستثمارات الأجنبية:
• حماية الاستثمارات الضخمة: نضع تساؤلاً جوهرياً أمام المجتمع الدولي: من سيحمي الاستثمارات الأجنبية الكبرى في ظل منظومة تشرعن النهب؟ إن الاعتداءات على الشركات الأجنبية وخطوط النفط والغاز لن تُصنف كـ “أخطاء فردية”، بل هي “أدوات ابتزاز سياسي” تستخدمها المنظومة كـ “Reactions” Against any international pressure.
• The economy is in the service of extremism: The money is stolen (The 7% And bribes) It does not go to development, it is used for financing “Extremist system” It encircles the law, and is the direct cause of the starvation of the Syrian people and the destruction of their capabilities.
إن المراهنة على “أمان الاستثمار” في سورية بوجود هذه البنية الأيديولوجية هي مراهنة خاسرة. ستبقى الشركات الأجنبية ومشاريع الطاقة الإقليمية عرضة للاختطاف والابتزاز والاعتداءات الأمنية الممنهجة، طالما أن “Militia mentality” هي التي تقود وزارة العدل والاقتصاد.
المحور الخامس: الفشل الأمني الاستراتيجي.. from “سيادة الدولة” to “وظيفية الميليشيات والأنفاق”
Strategic introduction:
يرصد هذا المحور العجز البنيوي لمنظومة دمشق عن ممارسة دور “الدولة الضامنة للأمن”. إن ارتهان القرار الأمني للمجموعات الراديكالية والمشاريع العابرة للحدود جعل من “الواجهة السياسية” مجرد غطاء لتمرير أجندات تصعيد إقليمي، مما أسقط شرعية المنظومة كشريك أمني موثوق أمام المجتمع الدولي.
- كذبة “ضبط الحدود” وفشل “فصل الساحات”:
• الخداع الميداني: بالرغم من الوعود السياسية بـ “التهدئة”، أثبتت الوقائع استمرار تحويل الأراضي السورية إلى مخازن وممرات للسلاح الاستراتيجي.
• Physical evidence: اعتراف وتضحية وزارة الدفاع مؤخراً بـ “نفق استراتيجي” في منطقة (Mr. Ali's yard” And missile control “Concourse)
It is used to smuggle weapons into Lebanon, which proves that the authority is either “Partner” or “Helpless” Completely under the influence of the militias.
• Export chaos: Syrian geography has become a platform for threatening the security of the Arab neighbourhood (Jordan and the Gulf) عبر تهريب السلاح والمخدرات، مما يعكس فشل “التجربة” في تحجيم القوى الراديكالية التي تسيطر على القرار الأمني الفعلي. - استهداف البعثات الدبلوماسية وسقوط “هيبة القانون”:
• حادثة السفارة الإماراتية نموذجاً: يمثل الاعتداء على البعثات الدبلوماسية بدمشق برهاناً قاطعاً على استخدام المنظومة لـ “الغوغاء” And radical tools to blackmail Arab brothers, in flagrant violation of the Vienna Convention, which proves that they are... “Functional system” It implements a confrontational agenda by proxy.
• Absence of security reference: Multiple security loyalties inside Damascus and encirclement “Official decision” With ideological militias, this led to the loss of criminal responsibility, and made it impossible to hold any party accountable for major security violations..
Sixth axis: الخداع الاستراتيجي والمتاجرة بالأزمات (الهروب من “ثورة الجياع” about “التصعيد الإقليمي”)
Strategic introduction:
يرصد هذا المحور لجوء المنظومة إلى “افتعال الأزمات الخارجية” لتنفيس الضغط الداخلي الناتج عن الجوع والقهر. Trading in nationalist sentiments and the Palestinian issue is a failed attempt to reserve a seat in the regional peace equation, while the reality is complete dependence on the axis of radicalism and the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood.. - Targeting “دول الاعتدال العربي” (لغة السب والابتزاز):
• انتهاك السيادة الدبلوماسية: تحريك “الغوغاء” الموجهين أمنياً للإساءة للأشقاء العرب لفظياً وميدانياً يثبت غياب القرار السيادي الوطني، والارتهان لأجندة “Subversive” It aims to strike the Arab depths in favor of extremist regional parties.
• Axes game: Using insulting language is a miserable attempt at financial and political blackmail, and to show Damascus as a power “reluctance” زائفة للتغطية على دورها في تمزيق المنطقة. - المتاجرة بالقضية الفلسطينية في ظل “الجوع والقهر”:
• الاستثمار في الدماء: استخدام الخطاب التحريضي كـ “ستار دخاني” لتشتيت الأنظار عن انعدام الأمن الغذائي والدوائي للسوريين.
• التخادم مع فكر الإخوان: تمثل المتاجرة بالقضية “نقطة الالتقاء” الكبرى بين المنظومة وفكر الإخوان المسلمين؛ حيث يُستخدم الخطاب الديني والقومي لتبرير الفشل التنموي وقمع الحريات. - الانفجار الداخلي و”ثورة الجياع” المكبوتة:
• كارثة “الحراقات اليدوية” ودير الزور: توثيق الانهيار الاقتصادي الناتج عن توقف سبل العيش (مثل الحراقات) دون بدائل، مما دفع الأهالي نحو حافة الهلاك. هذا التدمير الممنهج هو المحرك الأساسي لـ “Hungry revolution” لا تُخمد بالشعارات.
• تجاهل الاحتجاجات الحالية: رصد سياسة “الهروب للأمام” في التعامل مع مظاهرات الغلاء، عبر تخوين المطالب المحقة وتصويرها كمؤامرات خارجية لمنع سقوط “Functional system”. - الفشل في “حجز مقعد” بالسلام الإقليمي:
• المقايضة الخاسرة: تحولت المنظومة إلى “عبء أمني وأيديولوجي”؛ فالعاجز عن تأمين وقود التدفئة وإطعام شعبه لا يمكن أن يكون شريكاً موثوقاً في بناء استقرار إقليمي أو حماية ممرات طاقة دولية.
نحذر من أن ما يجري في دمشق اليوم هو “تمهيد لانفجار مجتمعي شامل”. إن محاولات تشتيت الأنظار بالاعتداء على السفارات أو المتاجرة بالقضايا القومية هي “رقصة الوداع” لسلطة فقدت مقومات الشرعية. إن البديل الوطني المستقل هو الوحيد القادر على نزع فتيل “ثورة الجياع” وإعادة سورية إلى محيطها العربي المعتدل كدولة مؤسسات وقانون.
المحور السابع: strategy “Alternative masks”.. تعرية التغلغل الإخواني والإيراني عبر الواجهات “المدنية” المستعارة
Strategic introduction:
يكشف هذا المحور عن المحاولات المستمرة والممنهجة لجماعة الإخوان المسلمين والمحور الإيراني للسيطرة على مستقبل سورية عبر “وجوه مستعارة”. إن استخدام المال السياسي لشراء واجهات (علمانية، مسيحية، ومن الأقليات) هو تكرار لتجارب الفشل السابقة التي أجهضت العمل الوطني عبر “معارضة الخارج” سابقاً، ويهدف لتمرير أجندات أيديولوجية سرية تحت شعارات “Civil state” الزائفة، في ظل رفض شعبي وإقليمي ودولي قاطع لهذه المكونات الراديكالية.
- استنساخ الفشل: “الوكيل المدني” لجماعة الإخوان المسلمين:
• لعبة الوجوه الجديدة: رصد محاولات جماعة الإخوان المسلمين (بتمويل المال السياسي الإقليمي) تقديم “مشروع سياسي بوجوه علمانية” أو من “Minorities” كغطاء للمرحلة القادمة. هذا التكتيك يهدف للالتفاف على الرفض الدولي والصارم للجماعة، ومحاولة حجز مقعد في السلطة بأسماء تدعي الوطنية بينما هي مرتهنة بالكامل لقرار التنظيم.
• المسؤولية الجنائية والوطنية: تتحمل هذه الشخصيات (الواجهات) المسؤولية الكاملة أمام الشعب السوري عن محاولة تمرير أجندة أيديولوجية تحت ستار المدنية.
• الإصرار على “الأجندة الحزبية” الإقصائية: يظهر الفشل الوطني لهذه القوى في رفضها الاندماج ضمن أحزاب وطنية عابرة للمذاهب والأديان، وإصرارها على البقاء كـ “تنظيم أيديولوجي علني” يسعى لفرض رؤيته المتطرفة، ضاربين عرض الحائط بكل تجارب التاريخ المريرة. - الرفض الوطني للأحزاب على أسس دينية:
• المعايير القانونية الدولية: تؤكد هذه الوثيقة على الرفض الوطني السوري القاطع لترخيص أو قبول أي حزب يقوم على “أساس ديني” (إخواني أو غيره). إن استقرار سورية يتطلب أحزاباً تقوم على “أسس قانونية وطنية” وبرامج تنموية، وليس على تحشيد أيديولوجي يمزق النسيج الاجتماعي.
• السيادة الوطنية مقابل المال السياسي: التحذير من أن هذه “الواجهات المأجورة” التي ارتضت أن تكون غطاءً للإخوان مقابل المال، لا تملك أي شرعية شعبية في الداخل السوري الجائع، وتمثل تهديداً مباشراً لأي مسار ديمقراطي حقيقي. - “الخبرات السورية” في خدمة ولاية الفقيه (الخداع الإيراني):
• الوطنية الزائفة كقناع للتبعية: رصد محاولات طهران العودة للمشهد السياسي السوري عبر واجهات تدعي “الوطنية والخبرة” وتستخدم فزاعة “التطرف السني” غطاءً لها، بينما هي في العمق تتبع عقائدياً وسياسياً لـ “Guardianship of the Jurist”. هؤلاء يعملون كأدوات لوجستية للمشروع الإيراني لتثبيت التغيير الديموغرافي والمذهبي.
• المتاجرة المزدوجة بفلسطين: تلتقي الأدوات الإيرانية مع الإخوانية في استخدام “القضية الفلسطينية” كمحرك عاطفي للتغطية على جرائمهم بحق الشعب السوري ولتشتيت الأنظار عن ارتهانهم للخارج.
[الخلاصة الاستراتيجية الختامية: سورية بين استحقاق التغيير وفخ المنظومات الوظيفية] - حتمية الفشل البنيوي لنموذج “Ahmed Al-Sharaa” (Golani) ومنظومته:
أثبتت الوقائع الموثقة في كافة محاور هذه الوثيقة أن تجربة “Ahmed Al-Sharaa” (Golani) لم تكن مجرد فشل فردي، بل كانت استحالة ميكانيكية؛ فلا يمكن لشخصية “واجهة” وبخلفية جهادية صريحة أن تنجح داخل منظومة راديكالية مطوقة بفكر الإخوان المسلمين وأجندات المحاور الإقليمية. إن التضاد الصارخ بين “الادعاء المدني” and”الواقع المتطرف” أدى إلى شلل الدولة وتحولها إلى أداة للهدم، مما يجعل المراهنة على استمرار هذه المنظومة مراهنة على استدامة الفوضى. - سورية كعائق أمام “السلام الإقليمي” وممرات الطاقة:
لا أمان للمنطقة في ظل وجود هذه المنظومة. إن طموحات المنطقة في مشاريع التنمية الكبرى (ممرات الغاز، الطاقة، والربط السككي) ستبقى “رهينة” An unstable security environment governed by “The economy of royalties” (The 7%) And systematic looting. Syria under rule “Radical masks” It will remain “A black hole” It threatens navigation, international trade, and neighborhood stability. - استحقاقات المرحلة الانتقالية: البديل الوطني المستقل:
إن الخروج من النفق المظلم يتطلب تجاوز “لعبة الوجوه المستعارة” (واجهات الإخوان أو أدوات إيران). الاستقرار الحقيقي يبدأ بـ:
• تفكيك المنظومة الوظيفية: إزاحة الفكر الراديكالي من مفاصل القرار السياسي والأمني والتعليمي.
• دولة المؤسسات والقانون: بناء سورية على أسس مدنية خالصة تُجرم الأحزاب القائمة على أساس ديني أو طائفي وفق المعايير الدولية.
• مكافحة التطرف (مدنياً وعسكرياً): مرحلة انتقالية مطورة تضع “الاستقلال الوطني” Above political money, the land will be cleansed of the seeds of terrorism planted by years of subjugation. - Final message to the international community
It is a united and civil Syria “safety valve” The only one for the Middle East. إن أي محاولة لترميم الفشل الحالي أو القبول بصفقات “الوجوه البديلة” هي مشاركة في جريمة تفتيت سورية وتهديد السلم الدولي. البديل الوطني المستقل هو الشريك الوحيد القادر على نزع فتيل “ثورة الجياع” And restore Syria as a center for stability and development
Mr. Qutaiba Qasim Al-Arab
President of the National Council for Human Rights
Strategic Deception Document (The Proxy Masks)
“Syria Between National Stability and the Trap of Functional Systems: A Strategic Vision for Deconstructing Extremist Structures and Safeguarding National, Regional, and International Security”
Executive Summary:
This document provides an in-depth strategic analysis of the structural and ideological framework currently governing the Syrian capital, Damascus. Moving beyond the mere documentation of daily violations, this report exposes a “System of Deception”—a sophisticated apparatus that employs civil and secular façades as masks to advance a radical agenda linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and extremist regional axes.
Key Pillars of the Document:
• Exposing the Façade: Uncovering the structural contradiction between the “civil” rhetoric of Ahmad al-Sharaa and the ideologically driven field practices.
• Deconstructing Criminality: Linking criminal violations (kidnappings, looting, and the 7% illegal levies) to the systematic financing of the radical apparatus.
• Security Warning: Demonstrating that the continuation of this system poses a direct threat to energy security, international trade routes, and the social peace of neighboring countries.
• The National Alternative: Presenting the features of an independent path that rejects “proxy masks” and upholds the rule of law and sovereign institutions.
Notice to International Stakeholders:
This document is more than a human rights report; it is an “Early Warning” to global powers. Betting on the “rehabilitation” of a failed system or accepting “borrowed façades” will inevitably reproduce extremism in more complex forms. This makes a future societal explosion certain—one that will transcend Syrian borders and impact
Pillar I: The Impossibility of Reform in a Radical Environment: The Failure of the “Individual Experiment” and the Hegemony of the Ideological System
Strategic Prelude:
Political and field realities prove that attempting to present a “figurehead” as a facade for reform or stability within a system governed by “extremist religious and intellectual agendas” is an experiment predestined for failure. The structural contradiction between the “civilian facade” and the radical Muslim Brotherhood core has led to the complete paralysis of state institutions. This has negatively impacted local and regional stability, significantly embarrassing international parties that bet on this model as a middle-ground solution.
- The “Brotherhood Encirclement” and the Paralysis of Sovereign Decision-Making:
• Ideological Shadow Authority: Real executive power was never in the hands of “Al-Sharaa”; rather, he remained encircled by a radical system that adopted the ideology of the “Muslim Brotherhood” within the vital sectors of education, the judiciary, and society. This encirclement rendered any attempt at a political solution merely “ink on paper,” as the transborder religious agenda remains the actual driver on the ground and the controller of the decision-making compass.
• The Failure of the Individual Experiment: Placing an “individual” from a jihadist background into an intellectual and operational environment hostile to the international trends and commitments required of him is an inevitable “structural failure.” Extremism in Damascus was not merely a transient phenomenon; it was the “ruling system” itself, which swallows any attempt to deviate from the context of radicalization and dependency. - Engineering Extremism: Transforming the “State” into an Ideological Incubator:
• Conditioning the Ground Against Curricula and Civil Life: Instead of building a state of citizenship, the system (driven by its Brotherhood engine) sought to poison educational curricula and booby-trap the minds of children with exclusionary thought. This ideology targeted “women” as the weakest link, transforming them from civilian partners into victims of a militant religious agenda that protects the survival of the regime.
• Manufacturing the “Radical Generation” (Field Evidence): The minds of the youth were targeted to sow exclusionary and jihadist thought, aiming to tear the Syrian social fabric and serve a future regional scheme.
• Documentary Example: The activities of the “Al-Wahy al-Sharif Foundation,” which operates more than 75 branches. Visual recordings circulate documenting child recruitment and brainwashing operations.
• Military Infiltration: Monitoring youth recruitment operations into the army under direct “Brotherhood” arrangements, subjecting them to ideological “Sharia courses” aimed at instilling loyalty to the ideology rather than loyalty to the nation.
• Incitement and Deliberate Silence: The system was not “incapable” of controlling extremism; rather, it was a “beneficiary” of it. Social incitement and the spreading of seeds of division were permitted to prevent the emergence of a “unified national current.” The system deliberately deepened hate speech, settling for formal rejections and media statements marketed abroad, without taking any actual legal or executive measures to combat this expansion. - International Repercussions: The Collapse of the Bet on “Who Brought Him”:
• Burnt International Cards: The failure of this experiment did not stop at Syria’s borders; it reflected as a “strategic failure” for the international and regional entities that attempted to market this model. Reality has proven that the extremist system does not accept partnership, and betting on “individuals” without changing the “intellectual and methodological structure” is a losing bet that has embarrassed its allies.
• Regional Danger: With this radical ideology encircled by the Brotherhood, Syria has transformed from a “potential partner in peace” into a “platform for exporting ideological and security chaos,” posing a direct threat to the security and stability of neighboring countries and the region as a whole.
Pillar II: Systematic Violations and the Undermining of Social Peace (From “Organized Crime” to “Existential Persecution”)
Strategic Prelude:
This pillar monitors the moral and legal collapse of the Damascus apparatus by documenting a series of crimes and violations targeting Syrian components in sensitive geographical areas (from the Coast to Suwayda and other Syrian regions). The apparatus’s failure to protect citizens, and its direct involvement in these violations, proves that it has transformed into an “authority of intimidation” that lacks the basic requirements of a state guarantor of security.
- War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity (According to International Reports):
• UN Documentation: Based on reports from the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, systematic patterns of murder, arbitrary detention, and forced displacement have been documented.
• The Coast and Suwayda: These areas have been turned into arenas for “collective punishment,” where organized crime is used as a political tool to break the community’s will and domesticate the popular base under the weight of an existential threat.
• USCIRF Report: Reference is made to the report of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and its recommendation to designate Syria as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) due to its crimes against minorities. - The Strategy of “Abduction and Blackmail” (Financing Militias with Blood):
• Systematic Abductions: Documenting the escalation of civilian kidnappings (including women and minors) in areas under the apparatus’s influence. These operations are managed as a “bloody economic system” to finance power-linked militias through exorbitant ransom demands.
• Organic Complicity and International Recognition:
• The New York Times Report: We rely fundamentally on the findings of the recent investigation by the American newspaper, which documented with physical evidence the involvement of networks linked to the apparatus in cross-border kidnapping and extortion, granting the case an irrefutable international criminal dimension.
• “The Coast Abductees” Investigation: The silence of security agencies regarding kidnapping networks known by name and affiliation proves organic complicity.
• Material Evidence: The documentation we possess, including dozens of names responsible for these operations, places the apparatus in the position of the “perpetrator,” not the arbiter. - Targeting “Indigenous Components” and Dismantling the Christian Presence:
• Silent Displacement and Intimidation: Monitoring systematic tightening policies through economic pressure and security intimidation, leading to the “smashing of shops and homes” to drive Christian talent toward forced migration, which negates the claim of “protecting minorities.”
• Irrefutable Facts: Recent attacks in Suqaylabiyah (Hama countryside), the church bombing incident in Damascus, and the individual and systematic violations targeting places of worship, as well as the imposition of “radical ideological discourse and proselytization” within areas of Christian specificity.
• Seizure of Property: Documenting cases of seizing real estate and private property under the cover of unjust laws, aimed at changing social demographics and emptying areas of their original inhabitants in favor of the “functional class” and extremist axes. - Field Violations: From the Coast to Suwayda:
• Suppression of Popular Movements: Documenting violations against the peaceful movement in Suwayda, and the use of “intellectual and security intimidation” and the assassination of activists to suppress any voice demanding dignity and livelihood.
• Insulting the Popular Base (The Coast): Monitoring cases of humiliation and contempt to which the people of the Syrian Coast are subjected at checkpoints and in official departments, turning their sacrifices into “fuel” for the survival of an apparatus that protects only its own interests, leading to a state of suppressed popular simmering that foretells an imminent social explosion. - Criminal Deconstruction of Individual Violations:
• Torture and Arbitrary Detention: The continuation of enforced disappearance practices and systematic torture within the security branches that surround decision-making in Damascus. These practices prove that the “extremist apparatus” we dismantled in the first pillar is the one managing the security scene with a vengeful mentality, operating outside any legal or moral framework.
Pillar III: The Theater of Accountability and Formal Justice (Falsifying Rights to Perpetuate Impunity)
Strategic Prelude:
This pillar monitors the attempts of the “Al-Sharaa” apparatus to mislead international public opinion by adopting a rhetoric of “sham accountability” and presenting “procedural superficialities” that suggest reform. This “Formal Justice” is not intended to provide redress for victims; rather, it is designed to provide a legal cover for the continuation of organized crime and to whitewash the records of those involved in major violations (murder, kidnapping, looting, and systematic starvation).
- “Facade Judiciary”: Mock Trials and the Exoneration of Perpetrators:
• Falsifying Accountability: Documenting the system’s recourse to secret or sham internal trials targeting “scapegoats” among secondary figures. Meanwhile, the real leaders of the murder, kidnapping, and looting networks (directly backed by the family and extremist axes) remain immune and above any law.
• Emptying the Law of its Substance: Using the Ministry of Justice (ideologized by Jihadist thought) to issue “certificates of innocence” to actual criminals by manipulating legal articles. This transforms the judiciary into a “legal laundromat” for criminal and political offenses committed under the auspices of the authority. - Targeting “Transitional Justice” and Booby-trapping the File of the Disappeared:
• Manipulation of the Missing Persons File: Utilizing the file of the “enforced disappeared” and victim statistics as a “political bargaining chip” in international negotiations, without providing any real disclosures or acknowledging criminal responsibility, thereby entrenching the continuity of the crime.
• The Impossibility of Justice under “Encirclement”: Proving that transitional justice requires total judicial independence—a technical impossibility under a system encircled by the “Muslim Brotherhood ideology” and the agendas of axes that view genuine accountability as an existential threat to their structure. - Misleading the International Community with “Paper Committees”:
• Sham Investigative Committees: Monitoring the formation of formal investigative committees following every major crime (such as the kidnapping incidents in Suwayda or the office burning in Damascus), which invariably conclude by “recording the crime against an unknown perpetrator” or blaming imaginary external parties. These committees are tools for “absorbing public anger” rather than discovering the truth.
• Buying Time via the Brotherhood Machine: Exposing the role of mercenary “secular facades” operating within the Brotherhood machine abroad (London and Washington) to promote these judicial theatrics. These campaigns aim to convince Western capitals that a “reform path” has begun, in order to prevent the imposition of new international sanctions or genuine legal prosecutions against the heads of the apparatus. - Strategic Linkage: Justice as a “Decoration” for Continuity:
• A system that violates private property (the 7% levy) and targets the right to life through systematic kidnapping cannot be a guardian of justice. True justice begins with deconstructing the “Functional System” and holding its leaders accountable, not through “legal touch-ups” that grant killers the opportunity to persist under misleading new titles.
Warning to the International Community:
We warn the international community against being deceived by the “human rights language” recently adopted by Damascus. It is a “formal justice” designed in intelligence chambers, aimed at aborting genuine international accountability. Any recognition of these theatrics constitutes a blatant betrayal of the victims and encourages the apparatus to continue its criminal approach, encircled by extremism and foreign dependency.
Pillar IV: The Economy of Intimidation and Ideological Bartering (Destruction of the Investment Climate and Hegemony of Familial Looting)
Strategic Prelude:
This pillar reveals the impossibility of establishing any sustainable economic or investment activity under a system governed by a “militia mentality” and encircled by “ideological agendas.” The absence of legal security, and the replacement of a civil judiciary with concealed “Jihadist Sharia” references, has turned Syria into an environment that repels capital and serves as a platform for systematic looting and extortion. This directly threatens any regional energy or development projects.
- Absence of Legal Security and the “Ideologization” of the Ministry of Justice:
• Infiltration of Radical Thought: Monitoring the transformation of the judicial institution and the Ministry of Justice into tools for the extremist agenda. Commercial disputes are managed via “Jihadist Sharia” references and narrow interests that have no relation to civil law.
• Pro-forma Investment Law Traps: Proving that declared investment laws are merely “legal smokescreens” to attract funds, while being bypassed by supreme security decrees that confiscate investor rights and prevent the repatriation of profits. - Institutionalizing Looting: The “Percentage Economy” and the 7% Levy:
• The Family Loyalty Tax: Documenting the imposition of a fixed rate of up to 7% (known as the “Family Percentage”) as an illegal tax forcibly extracted from the profits of major projects for the benefit of the system’s inner circle.
• Forced Partners: Compelling investors to accept “phantom partners” from relatives of the ruling elite or their proxies, transforming the Syrian economy into a “familial fiefdom” managed with a mafia-like, rather than state-like, mentality.
• Systemic Million-Dollar Bribery: The transformation of bribery into a fundamental “Operating System” across all state departments, inflating investment costs and making it economically unfeasible for any entity respecting international integrity standards. - Field Terrorism Against Investors (The Damascus Office Burning Incident):
• Messages of Fire: The use of “deliberate sabotage” (as seen in the burning of the office in Damascus) as a means of political and security intimidation against investors who refuse to comply with “percentage” demands or bribery.
• Absence of Accountability: The occurrence of these crimes in the heart of the capital without any prosecution proves that state apparatuses provide legal cover for the “saboteurs” affiliated with the system. - Security Chaos and Looting Under “National” Pretexts:
• “High-Risk” Environment: The security breakdown (kidnapping, looting, absence of the rule of law) directly impacts oil, gas, and energy investments.
• Systematic Plunder: Monitoring cases of raids on economic facilities under the pretext of “national contribution,” leading to the flight of the remaining Syrian industrial and commercial class to neighboring countries. - Strategic Warning: Energy Security and Foreign Investment:
• Protecting Mega-Investments: We pose a fundamental question to the international community: Who will protect major foreign investments under a system that legitimizes looting? Attacks on foreign companies and oil/gas pipelines will not be classified as “individual errors” but as “political blackmail tools” used by the system as “reactions” to any international pressure.
• Economy in the Service of Extremism: Looted funds (the 7% and bribes) do not go toward development; instead, they finance the “extremist apparatus” encircling Al-Sharaa, which is the direct cause of the Syrian people’s starvation and the destruction of their resources.
Conclusion:
Betting on “investment security” in Syria while this ideological structure exists is a losing wager. Foreign companies and regional energy projects will remain vulnerable to abduction, extortion, and systematic security attacks as long as the “militia mentality” leads the
Pillar V: Strategic Security Failure: From “State Sovereignty” to the “Functionality of Militias and Tunnels”
Strategic Prelude:
This pillar monitors the structural inability of the Damascus apparatus to fulfill the role of a “state guarantor of security.” The dependency of security decision-making on radical groups and trans-border projects has turned the “political facade” into a mere cover for advancing regional escalation agendas. This has stripped the apparatus of its legitimacy as a reliable security partner in the eyes of the international community.
- The Myth of “Border Control” and the Failure of “De-linking Fronts”:
• Field Deception: Despite political promises of “de-escalation,” facts on the ground have proven the continued transformation of Syrian territory into warehouses and corridors for strategic weaponry.
• Physical Evidence: The Ministry of Defense’s recent admission and sacrifice of a “strategic tunnel” in the Housh al-Sayyid Ali area—along with the seizure of “Competition” missiles—proves that Syrian soil is being used for arms smuggling into Lebanon. This confirms that the authority is either a “partner” or “completely impotent” in the face of extremist militia dominance.
• Exporting Chaos: The transformation of Syrian geography into a platform for threatening the security of Arab neighbors (Jordan and the Gulf) through the smuggling of weapons and narcotics reflects the failure of the “experiment” to curtail the radical forces that control actual security decisions. - Targeting Diplomatic Missions and the Collapse of the “Prestige of Law”:
• The UAE Embassy Incident as a Model: The attack on diplomatic missions in Damascus serves as conclusive proof that the apparatus utilizes “mobs” and radical tools to blackmail Arab brothers. This is a flagrant violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, proving that we are facing a “functional system” executing a confrontational agenda by proxy.
• Absence of Security Reference: The multiplicity of security loyalties within Damascus and the encirclement of “official decision-making” by ideological militias has led to the loss of criminal responsibility. This makes it impossible to hold any entity accountable for major security breaches.
Pillar VI: Strategic Deception and Crisis Profiteering (Escaping the “Bread Riots” through “Regional Escalation”)
Strategic Prelude:
This pillar monitors the apparatus’s recourse to “fabricating external crises” to vent internal pressure resulting from hunger and oppression. The exploitation of nationalist sentiments and the Palestinian cause is a failed attempt to secure a seat in the regional peace equation, while the reality is a total dependency on the radical axis and the Muslim Brotherhood’s ideology.
- Targeting “Arab Moderation States” (Rhetoric of Insults and Blackmail):
• Violation of Diplomatic Sovereignty: The mobilization of security-directed “mobs” to insult Arab brothers verbally and on the ground proves the absence of national sovereign decision-making and a total reliance on a “subversive” agenda aimed at striking the Arab depth in favor of extremist regional parties.
• The Game of Axes: Using a language of insults and vitriol is a desperate attempt at financial and political blackmail, aiming to portray Damascus as a false “resistance” force to cover its functional role in tearing the region apart. - Exploiting the Palestinian Cause amidst “Hunger and Oppression”:
• Investing in Blood: Monitoring the use of inflammatory rhetoric as a “smoke screen” to distract Syrians from their lack of food and medical security.
• Collusion with Brotherhood Ideology: Profiteering from the Palestinian cause represents the major “meeting point” between the apparatus and the Muslim Brotherhood’s thought, where religious and nationalist discourse is used to justify developmental failure and the suppression of internal freedoms. - Internal Explosion and the Suppressed “Revolution of the Hungry”:
• The “Handmade Oil Refineries” (He got angry) Disaster and Deir ez-Zor: Documenting the economic collapse resulting from the cessation of livelihoods (such as the handmade refineries) without real alternatives, pushing residents to the brink of death. This systematic destruction of livelihoods is the primary driver of a “Revolution of the Hungry” that cannot be extinguished by slogans.
• Ignoring Current Protests: Monitoring the “flight forward” policy in dealing with protests against high prices and hunger, by treasoning legitimate demands and portraying them as external conspiracies in a desperate attempt to prevent the fall of the “Functional System.” - Failure to “Secure a Seat” in Regional Peace:
• The Losing Bargain: The apparatus has transformed into a “security and ideological burden.” Those who are unable to provide heating fuel or feed their people cannot be reliable partners in building regional stability or protecting international energy corridors.
Strategic Warning:
We warn that what is happening in Damascus today is a “prelude to a total societal explosion.” Attempts to distract attention by attacking embassies or profiteering from nationalist causes are the “farewell dance” of an authority that has lost all components of legitimacy. The Independent National Alternative is the only one capable of defusing the “Revolution of the Hungry” and returning Syria to its moderate Arab surroundings as a state of institutions and law.
Pillar VII: The “Proxy Masks” Strategy: Exposing Muslim Brotherhood and Iranian Infiltration via Borrowed “Civilian” Facades
Strategic Prelude:
This pillar reveals the continuous and systematic attempts by the Muslim Brotherhood and the Iranian axis to control the future of Syria through “borrowed faces.” The use of political money to purchase facades (secular, Christian, and from other minorities) is a repetition of previous failed experiments that aborted national action via the “external opposition” in the past. It aims to pass secret ideological agendas under the false slogans of a “Civil State,” in the face of categorical popular, regional, and international rejection of these radical components.
- Cloning Failure: The “Civil Agent” of the Muslim Brotherhood:
• The Game of New Faces: Monitoring the Muslim Brotherhood’s attempts (funded by regional political money) to present a “political project with secular faces” or from “minorities” as a cover for the upcoming phase. This tactic aims to circumvent the strict international and regional rejection of the group and to secure a seat in power using names that claim patriotism while being entirely beholden to the organization’s decisions.
• Criminal and National Responsibility: These figures (the facades) bear full responsibility before the Syrian people for attempting to pass an ideological agenda under the guise of civility.
• Insistence on an Exclusionary “Partisan Agenda”: The national failure of these forces is evident in their refusal to integrate into cross-sectarian and cross-religious national parties, and their insistence on remaining an “overt ideological organization” seeking to impose its extremist vision, ignoring all the bitter lessons of history. - National Rejection of Parties Based on Religious Grounds:
• International Legal Standards: This document affirms the categorical Syrian national rejection of licensing or accepting any party based on a “religious basis” (Brotherhood or otherwise). Syria’s stability requires parties based on “national legal foundations” and developmental programs, not on ideological mobilization that tears the social fabric.
• National Sovereignty vs. Political Money: A warning that these “mercenary facades,” which accepted being a cover for the Brotherhood in exchange for money, possess no popular legitimacy within the starving Syrian interior and represent a direct threat to any genuine democratic path. - “Syrian Expertise” in the Service of Wilayat al-Faqih (Iranian Deception):
• Pseudo-Patriotism as a Mask for Dependency: Monitoring Tehran’s attempts to return to the Syrian political scene through facades claiming “patriotism and expertise” and using the “Sunni extremism” scarecrow as a cover. In reality, they are ideologically and politically subordinate to “Wilayat al-Faqih.” These actors work secretly as logistical and political tools for the Iranian project to consolidate demographic and sectarian change.
• Dual Profiteering from Palestine: Iranian tools meet Brotherhood tools in utilizing the “Palestinian cause” as an emotional driver to cover their crimes against the Syrian people and to distract attention from their dependency on foreign powers.
Strategic Conclusion: Syria Between the Necessity of Change and the Trap of Functional Systems
- The Inevitability of Structural Failure for the “Ahmad al-Sharaa” (Jolani) Model:
The facts documented throughout this document prove that the experiment of Ahmad al-Sharaa (Jolani) was not merely an individual failure, but a mechanical impossibility. A “facade” figure with an explicit jihadist background cannot succeed within a radical system encircled by Muslim Brotherhood ideology and regional proxy agendas. The blatant contradiction between “civilian claims” and “extremist reality” has paralyzed the state, transforming it into a tool for destruction. Betting on the continuation of this system is a wager on the sustainability of chaos. - Syria as a Barrier to “Regional Peace” and Energy Corridors:
There is no security for the region as long as this system exists. The region’s ambitions for major development projects—including gas and energy pipelines and railway connectivity—will remain “hostage” to an unstable security environment governed by the “7% levy economy” and systematic looting. Under the rule of “Radical Masks,” Syria will remain a “black hole” threatening international navigation, global trade, and the stability of neighboring states. - Requirements for the Transitional Phase: The Independent National Alternative:
Exiting the dark Syrian tunnel requires moving beyond the “game of borrowed faces” (whether they are secular facades for the Brotherhood or pseudo-national tools for Iran). Real stability begins with:
• Deconstructing the Functional System: Removing radical ideology from the joints of political, security, and educational decision-making.
• A State of Institutions and Law: Building Syria on purely civil foundations that criminalize parties based on religious or sectarian grounds, in accordance with international standards.
• Combating Extremism (Civically and Militarily): Initiating an advanced transitional phase that prioritizes “National Independence” over political money and purges the land of the seeds of terrorism planted by years of foreign dependency. - Final Message to the International Community:
A unified, strong, and civil Syria is the only “safety valve” for the Middle East. Any attempt to rehabilitate the current failure or accept “alternative face” deals is complicity in the crime of fragmenting Syria and threatening international peace. The Independent National Alternative is the only partner capable of defusing the “Revolution of the Hungry” and restoring Syria as a center for regional stability and development
Mr. Khuhaba Qisim Al-Arab
President of the National Council for Human Rights
: Strategic Deception Document, National Council for Human Rights, Qutaiba Qasim Al-Arab, Alternative Masks, Ahmed Al-Sharaa, Al-Julani, Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, 7% Economy, Regional Energy Corridors, Syrian National Alternative, Systematic Violations, Middle East Stability.
• Strategic Deception Document, Proxy Masks Syria, National Council for Human Rights, Khuhaba Qisim Al-Arab, Ahmad al-Sharaa, HTS Syria, Muslim Brotherhood Infiltration, 7% Levy Economy, Regional Energy Corridors, Independent Syrian Alternative, Systematic Violations, Middle East Stability.
Featured with your friends:
