The national forces in Syria demand the dissolution of the Muslim Brotherhood organization and the dismantling of allegations of moderation

Powers Nationalism In Syria Demanding With a solution to organize Brotherhood Muslims And disintegrate allegations Moderation

Issued by the Syrian National Forces. History: 28 September / September 2026 AD

The country is going through an exceptional stage in its history that requires frank disclosure and solid national responsibility that rises to the level of the sacrifices of the Syrian people and their aspirations to establish a state of truth and law.. In response to the statement issued by “The Shura Council of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria” Dated 27 September 2026 AD, and the attempts it entails to recycle political discourse and claims “Centrism and nationalism” Ensuring dialogue and pluralism; The Syrian National Forces announce their settled legal and political position, based on international conventions and constitutional laws, in accordance with the following detailed specifications::

Firstly: Structural gaps and contradictions in the statement (Deconstructing the discourse)

1. Contradiction “Decision independence” With organic and historical extension (item 2):
   • Statement claim: The statement claims that the group “Independent national decision”.
   • Legal and political refutation: This claim contradicts the transnational organizational and ideological structure of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is linked to general secretariats and global Shura councils.. This is clearly demonstrated in “Unified logo” The comprehensive naming of the organization; Adding a phrase “In Syria” It does not mean at all the organization's patriotism or its separation from its cross-border roots. Syria's strategic sovereignty requires a complete ban on all organizational forms affiliated with regional or international agendas.
2. Double exploitation of concepts “Civil and moderate” To legitimize empowerment:
   • Statement claim: Singing with concepts “Citizenship rights”، “Civil peace”, and”Islamic moderation”.
   • Legal and political refutation: The term is used “Moderation” Here as a cosmetic cover for practice “Soft empowerment” And consecrating religious and party authority in forming the institutions of the transitional state. True citizenship is based on the complete and absolute neutrality of the state and its institutions towards all religions, sects and races, not on the monopoly of the religious concept and its use as an umbrella for partisan work and political quotas..
3. Escaping from transparent political competition to legitimization through quotas (item 3):
   • Statement claim: Welcome the start of business “People's Assembly” Preparing for a permanent constitution.
   • Legal and political refutation: This welcome aims to give urgent and early legitimacy to de facto institutions whose structures and laws the group contributes to. The group was involved in imposing appointments and agendas within this council to engineer legislation based on factionalism behind the scenes of the transitional authority, which empties political pluralism of its content and confiscates the will of the Syrians before going to free and competitive elections under international supervision..

secondly: Legal and moral disregard for field crimes and structural plunder

1. Willful blindness to violations of the New Testament (The coast and Suwayda):
   • The group's statement explicitly and suspiciously ignores the documented field crimes and violations witnessed in the Sahel, Suwayda and other regions, which were proven by the reports of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria.. Escaping from condemning these clear violations, and remaining silent about the previous incitement speeches that paved the way for them, empty slogans. “Civil peace” Of any moral credibility.
2. Absence of a vision for comprehensive and undivided transitional justice (item 5):
   • The statement suffices with the structural reference to “Justice for victims” Without making a legal commitment to a comprehensive transitional justice path that guarantees accountability and prosecution of all those involved in crimes since a year ago 2011 To this day, without exception or sectarian or ethnic discrimination, and ensuring full compensation and dignity for all victims.
3. Regional flattery at the expense of the people's livelihood (items 11-16):
   • The statement devotes a large amount of space to courting regional powers and axes for the purpose of gaining political legitimacy and satisfaction, while completely neglecting to develop a plan to confront the stifling living crises, sweeping poverty, hunger, and the collapse of basic services. These are crises for which the group bears a large part of the responsibility due to its direct and indirect control over the joints of service and humanitarian decisions, and the oil, education and endowment sectors. (Ottoman endowment).
4. Dismantling the system of plunder and confiscation of property:
   • The statement did not mention stopping the unjust confiscations and appropriations of lands (As happened in Qudsaya and other areas)Or put an end to the theft of national energy, oil and gas capabilities, and the spread of bribery and nepotism that turned the transitional authority into an extension of networks of influence and partisan empowerment, despite the group’s actual partnership in managing these sectors..

Third: National and human rights principles for a comprehensive response

In this response, the Syrian national forces rely on the overarching constitutional principles and the International Bill of Human Rights in accordance with the following axes:

1. Protecting children and prohibiting the ideology of education (CRC Convention):
   • We categorically reject bulldozing educational curricula, booby-trapping children’s minds with sectarian charges, or recruiting and exploiting them in ideological camps.. We demand the guarantee of modern civic education that is explicitly consistent with the two subjects (28 And 29) From the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) Which provide for developing respect for human rights and preparing the child for a life in a spirit of tolerance and peace, in addition to Article (38) Which prohibits the involvement of children in conflicts.
2. Full and unconditional participation of Syrian women (CEDAW and Security Council decisions):
   • We reject reducing the role of women to formal care frameworks, exercising guardianship over them, or ignoring the discrimination, attacks, and harassment they are currently exposed to.. We adhere to their inherent right to effective political and legislative participation in all decision-making centers in equal and influential proportions, based on the two articles: (7 And 8) of the CEDAW Convention, art (21) From the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the package of Security Council resolutions related to women, security and peace: (decision 1325 2000, Resolution 1820 2008, Resolution 1888 of 2009, and the resolution 1960 For a year 2010).
3. Licensing and establishment in accordance with the law and citizenship to protect society:
   • We affirm that in the future Syria, the establishment or licensing of any political parties on religious, sectarian, or ethnic grounds must be prohibited. Rather, they must be Syrian national parties that bring together the people of the country on the basis of programs and development under the roof of the Republic, while prohibiting any party from being associated with cross-border names that are historically linked to ideological tragedies that disturb civil, regional and international peace..
4. Pride in Syrian diversity and freedom of belief (Subject 18 From ICCPR and UDHR):
   • The ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity in Syria is the root of its cultural identity and the source of its cumulative wealth. We emphasize the binding activation of the article (18) From the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) And matter (18) From the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) For complete freedom of justice, thought, conscience, and religion, and a complete ban on practices of demographic change and the criminalization of actions that contradict words on the ground..
5. Refusing to replace regional axes and remaining silent about terrorism:
   • We completely reject replacing one regional hegemony with another (Such as replacing Iranian influence with Ottoman/Turkish influence)Or repeat the mistakes of the past by transferring crimes and violations to impose them on minorities. We also insist on explicitly condemning all forms of extremist, takfiri and terrorist thought and confronting all environments that incubate it..

Direct political entitlement (Conclusion)

“The experience of the past decades has proven beyond doubt that replacing Syria's civil and civilized face with cross-border partisan agendas will only bring the country more collapse and isolation.. Accordingly, the first and only credibility of any talk issued by the Muslim Brotherhood about ‘dialogue and moderation’’ It requires a positive and irreversible national entitlement: The immediate and complete dissolution of the Muslim Brotherhood organization in Syria, an end to the phenomenon of organizations and parties based on religious, sectarian or ethnic grounds, and the full involvement of all Syrians as individual citizens in a new political life in which unified national civil parties compete under the umbrella of the republic and the rule of law.”

                             Long live a free, civil, democratic and united Syria for all its people

28-09-2026

          Representative of the Syrian National Forces abroad

             National Council for Human Rights Syria

of the. Qutaibah Denominator Arab

  President

#Syria #Powers_Nationalism_Syrian #the Council_National_For rights_The human#Solution_to organize_Brotherhood_Muslims #Justice_Transitional #Rights_The human #nation_Citizenship#Syria_Civilian #Qutaibah_Denominator_Arab

National Forces in Syria Demand the Dissolution of the Muslim Brotherhood and Dismantle Its Claims of“Moderation“

Issued by: The Syrian National Forces Date: September 28, 2026

The homeland is passing through an exceptional phase in its history that demands candid disclosure and solid national responsibility, commensurate with the sacrifices of the Syrian people and their aspirations to establish a state of law and justice. In response to the statement issued by the “Shura Council of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria” on September 27, 2026, and its embedded attempts to recycle political discourse, claim “moderation and patriotism”, and express a deceptive keenness for dialogue and pluralism; the Syrian National Forces declare their decisive human rights and political position, anchored in international covenants and constitutional principles, according to the following detailed determinants:

First: Structural Flaws and Contradictions in the Statement (Deconstructing the Discourse)

1. The Contradiction of “Decision Independence” with Organic and Historical Transnational Reach (Clause 2):
   • The Statement’s Claim: The statement claims that the group is a “patriotic entity with independent decision-making”.
   • Rights-Based and Political Refutation: This claim fundamentally contradicts the transnational organizational and ideological structure of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is tied to global general secretariats and international Shura councils. This is explicitly manifested in their “unified logo” and global branding; adding the phrase “in Syria” in no way implies national independence or detachment from its transnational roots. Syria’s strategic sovereignty mandates a complete ban on all organizational forms affiliated with regional or international agendas.
2. The Dual Exploitation of “Civil State and Moderation” Concepts to Legitimize Empowerment:
   • The Statement’s Claim: Extolling the concepts of “citizenship rights,” “civil peace,” and “Islamic moderation”.
   • Rights-Based and Political Refutation: The term “moderation” is utilized here as a cosmetic cover to practice “soft empowerment” and entrench religious and partisan references in forming transitional state institutions. Genuine citizenship is grounded in the total and absolute neutrality of the state and its institutions toward all religions, sects, and ethnicities, rather than monopolizing religious concepts to serve partisan agendas and quota-based power-sharing.
3. Evasion of Transparent Political Competition via Quota-Based Legitimatization (Clause 3):
   • The Statement’s Claim: Welcoming the inauguration of the “People’s Assembly” and preparations for a permanent constitution.
   • Rights-Based and Political Refutation: This welcoming aims to confer premature legitimacy upon de facto institutions whose structures and laws the group helps engineer behind the scenes of the transitional authority. The group is implicated in imposing appointments and agendas within this assembly to tailor legislation to its factional interests prior to holding free, competitive elections under international supervision, thereby emptying political pluralism of its essence and usurping the will of the Syrian people.

Second: Human Rights and Ethical Blindness Toward Field Violations and Structural Looting

1. Deliberate Ignorance of New-Era Violations (The Coast and As-Suwayda):
   • The group’s statement suspiciously and explicitly ignores the documented field crimes and violations in the Coastal region, As-Suwayda, and elsewhere, as substantiated by the reports of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic. Evading the condemnation of these explicit violations, alongside silence over past incitement that paved the way for them, strips their “civil peace” slogans of all moral credibility.
2. Absence of a Vision for Comprehensive, Non-Fragmented Transitional Justice (Clause 5):
   • The statement settles for rhetorical references to “redressing victims” without presenting a binding legal commitment to a comprehensive transitional justice process that guarantees judicial accountability and prosecution for all perpetrators of crimes since 2011 to date, without exception or sectarian/ethnic discrimination, while ensuring full compensation and dignity for all victims.
3. Regional Flattery at the Expense of the People’s Livelihood Suffering (Clauses 11-16):
   • The statement devotes substantial space to courting regional powers and axes to gain political legitimacy, while completely failing to present a plan to address the suffocating economic crises, severe poverty, hunger, and collapsed public services. The group bears a major share of responsibility for these conditions due to its direct and indirect control over service and humanitarian decision-making, as well as the oil, education, and religious endowments (Ottoman Waqf) sectors.
4. Dismantling the System of Looting and Property Confiscation:
   • The statement failed to address halting arbitrary land confiscations and expropriations (as occurred in Qudsaya and other areas), or putting an end to the theft of national energy, oil, and gas resources, alongside widespread bribery and nepotism that have turned the transitional authority into an extension of partisan empowerment networks, despite the group’s actual partnership in managing these sectors.

Third: National and Rights-Based Principles for a Comprehensive Response

The Syrian National Forces base this response on unifying constitutional principles and the International Bill of Human Rights, structured around the following axes:

1. Child Protection and Prohibition of Educational Indoctrination (CRC Convention):
   • We categorically reject the alteration of educational curricula, the indoctrination of children’s minds with sectarian rhetoric, and their recruitment or exploitation in ideological camps. We demand modern civil education explicitly aligned with Articles (28 and 29) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which mandate fostering respect for human rights and preparing the child for a peaceful and tolerant life, in addition to Article (38), which prohibits involving children in armed conflicts.
2. Full and Unconditional Participation of Syrian Women (CEDAW and UNSC Resolutions):
   • We reject restricting women to token welfare roles, exercising guardianship over them, or ignoring the discrimination, abuses, and restrictions they currently face. We uphold their inherent right to active political and legislative participation in all decision-making bodies on an equal and impactful basis, pursuant to Articles (7 and 8) of the CEDAW Convention, Article (21) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the suite of UN Security Council Resolutions on Women, Peace, and Security: (Resolution 1325 of 2000, Resolution 1820 of 2008, Resolution 1888 of 2009, and Resolution 1960 of 2010).
3. Licensing and Formation Grounded in Law and Citizenship to Protect Society:
   • We affirm that in future Syria, the establishment or licensing of any political party based on religious, sectarian, or ethnic foundations must be strictly prohibited. Parties must be Syrian national entities uniting citizens through developmental programs under the umbrella of the Republic, prohibiting any party affiliation with transnational names historically associated with ideological tragedies that disrupt civil, regional, and international peace.
4. Upholding Syrian Diversity and Freedom of Belief (Article 18 of ICCPR and UDHR):
   • The ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity of Syria constitutes the root of its civilizational identity and a source of cumulative wealth. We emphasize the binding enforcement of Article (18) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and Article (18) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) to guarantee complete freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, alongside a total ban on demographic engineering practices and the criminalization of rhetoric that contradicts reality on the ground.
5. Rejection of Replacing Regional Axes and Silence on Terrorism:
   • We completely reject replacing one regional hegemony with another (such as replacing Iranian influence with Ottoman/Turkish influence) or repeating past mistakes by projecting violations onto minority groups. Furthermore, we insist on explicit condemnation of all forms of extremist, takfiri, and terrorist ideology, and dismantling all environments that harbor them.

The Direct Political Imperative (Conclusion)

“The experience of past decades has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that replacing Syria’s civil and civilized identity with transnational partisan agendas will bring the country nothing but further collapse and isolation. Consequently, the primary and sole test of credibility for any discourse issued by the Muslim Brotherhood regarding ‘dialogue and moderation’ demands an irreversible national imperative: The immediate and complete dissolution of the Muslim Brotherhood organization in Syria, ending the phenomenon of organizations and parties established on religious, sectarian, or ethnic grounds, and the full engagement of all Syrians as individual citizens in a new political life where national, civil, and inclusive parties compete under the umbrella of the Republic and the rule of law.”

Long live a free, civil, democratic, and united Syria for all its citizens

28-09-2026

Representative of the Syrian National Forces Abroad National Council for Human Rights – Syria Dr. Qutaiba Qassim Al-Arab President

 #Syria #SyrianNationalForces #NCHR_Syria #DissolveMuslimBrotherhood #TransitionalJustice #HumanRights #CivilState #SyrianCitizenship #QutaibaAlArab

• #Dissolve_Muslim_Brotherhood_Syria
• #Dr_Kutaiba_Kassem_Al_Arab
• #National_Council_for_Human_Rights
• #Syrian_National_Forces
• #Syria_2026