The National Council for Human Rights – Syria is an independent, non-governmental
Strategic report: Analysis of structural transformations in national sovereignty and the future of cross-border currents “Territorial security and agent gambling”
the introduction: “International security doctrine and the concept of ideological cleansing”
In light of the geopolitical transformations of 2026, international will is directed (Led by Washington) After issuing its strategy document to combat terrorism, it towards adopting a security doctrine that goes beyond... “Military confrontation” to “Drying up ideological sources”. There is no longer room for imaginary separation between “Field terrorism” (ISIS and Al-Nusra) And between “Intellectual incubator” (Muslim Brotherhood organization). Any regional stability from Syria to the African coast (Mali and Niger) Dependent on ending an era “Exceptions” Which was given to ideological movements to play a role “Moderate mediator”.
The first axis: “Soft hacking and false legitimacy engineering”
• Exploiting the Arab Spring: Analysis of the fall of a bet “International vision ” The precedent for political Islam as an alternative to stability, and awareness of their danger as “Parallel entities” It gnaws at the body of the national state.
• Parallel lobby: Monitor how to convert “Legal oppression” Freedom of belief has become a strategy for penetration into international organizations and European decision-making circles (Brussels and Washington) To impose reports that serve the organizational agenda at the expense of “National security” For the host countries and the late awakening, which requires a careful and comprehensive review.
The second axis: “The psychology of the hostage and blackmail in major cases”
• Digital polarization: Revealing the use of funded algorithms to target vulnerable groups and youth, and transforming livelihood frustration into... “Hostility to the national state”.
• Trading in the Palestinian issue: Expose the use case “Palestine” and”agitation” As political pressure cards and blackmail of religious sentiment, with the aim of forcing stable regimes to make internal concessions, and to become organically linked to “Iranian axis” As a Trojan horse to penetrate the Middle East to North Africa.
The third axis: “Syrian model: Anatomy of failure and hidden atrocities”
• Idlib as a holding company: transformation “Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham” (Led by Ahmed Al-Sharaa/Al-Julani) An economic mafia that controls energy and food under cover “Self-administration”.
• Westernization of identity and systematic extremism: Documenting the imposition of extremist ideology in educational curricula, the imposition of the veil on girls under the age of six, and the prohibition of photography to cover up operations “Brainwashing” With suspicious financing.
• plan “Moderate faces”: Expose attempt “The Minister of Endowments and the Brotherhood wing to whiten their faces for the next stage, to plant “Deep state” It ensures that the international organization remains in the joints of the Syrian state and uses Ahmed Al-Sharaa as a temporary front.
“Red lines of Syrian sovereignty”
Invalidation of investments and long agreements:
The Syrian National Forces confirm that no interim authority has the right to... “Reality salad” (Not elected) Signing long-term investment agreements or ceding an inch of Syrian territory. Any international bet on investments made via... “Certain parliaments” or “Formal structures” It is a bet on “Windmills”. No agreement will gain its legitimacy except through...:
• A permanent constitution approved by the Syrian people.
• An elected parliament and a legitimate president that unites the fractured geography.
The impossibility of transitional justice under the shadow of perpetrators:
Victims' rights cannot be jumped over “Formal committees” Whether international, national, or protocol visits. To the countries for deceiving and misleading them about the reality inside Syria. An authority that recently committed crimes in the coast and Suwayda and has a criminal history cannot confirm “Real justice”. Any attempt to make this model work via “Impoverishing the people” It is an attempt doomed to historical failure.
equation (Sharia = Brotherhood):
The continuation “Ahmed Al-Sharaa” As a front for the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood, it is a repetition of a model “Assad and Iran”. Just as Assad fell to get rid of Iranian dependency, the fall of the Brotherhood is the obligatory path to the fall of Sharia. This equation is what will push Syria towards true stability, and any circumvention of it is to prolong the suffering of the people.
Conclusion: “National sovereignty or organized chaos”
The continued marginalization of independent national competencies (And besiege her in her livelihood) It gives cross-border movements an opportunity to mislead international decision-makers. Stability is not built by “Countries within the country”. The independent national forces, based on their stability and vision, will redraw the reality of Syria in a way that achieves the aspirations of the people and their geopolitical position, away from deals. “Illusory peace” Which is done at the expense of the identity of future generations and the extremism of schools. We are not against peace according to the principle of peaceful coexistence, international law, and respect for the will of the people, but that it be reflected on the Syrian people and intersect with their interests with a new approach and not against them, and that they pay the price for it and remain in the mandate..
Mr. Qutaiba Qasim Al-Arab
President of the National Council for Human Rights
Statement of the National Forces in Syria
Strategic Report: Analysis of Structural Transformations in National Sovereignty and the Future of Cross-Border Currents “Regional Security and the Proxy Gamble”
Introduction: “International Security Doctrine and the Concept of Ideological Cleansing”
In light of the geopolitical shifts of 2026, the international will (led by Washington)—following the issuance of its counter-terrorism strategy document—is moving toward adopting a security doctrine that transcends “military confrontation” to “drying up ideological sources.” There is no longer room for the illusory separation between “field terrorism” (ISIS and Al-Nusra) and the “intellectual incubator” (the Muslim Brotherhood organization). Any regional stability from Syria to the African Sahel (Mali and Niger) is contingent upon ending the era of “exceptions” granted to ideologized currents to play the role of “moderate mediator.”
Axis I: “Soft Infiltration and the Engineering of False Legitimacy”
• Exploitation of the Arab Spring: Analysis of the collapse of the previous “international vision” bet on political Islam as an alternative for stability, and the realization of its danger as “parallel entities” eroding the body of the national state.
• The Parallel Lobby: Monitoring how “rights-based victimhood” and freedom of belief were converted into an infiltration strategy within international organizations and European decision-making circles (Brussels and Washington) to impose reports that serve the organizational agenda at the expense of the “national security” of host countries—a late awakening that requires a meticulous and comprehensive review.
Axis II: “The Psychology of the Hostage and Blackmail via Major Causes”
• Digital Polarization: Uncovering the use of funded algorithms to target vulnerable groups and youth, transforming livelihood frustration into “hostility toward the national state.”
• Trading on the Palestinian Cause: Exposing the use of the “Palestine” and “Hamas” cause as political pressure cards and tools for emotional religious blackmail, aimed at forcing stable regimes to make internal concessions, and the organic link with the “Iranian Axis” as a Trojan horse to penetrate from the Middle East into North Africa.
Axis III: “The Syrian Model: Dissecting Economic and Ethical Failure”
• Idlib as a Holding Company: The transformation of “Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham” (led by Ahmed al-Sharaa/al-Jolani) into an economic mafia controlling energy and food under the guise of “Self-Administration.”
• Alienation of Identity and Systematic Extremism: Documenting the imposition of extremist thought in educational curricula, the imposition of the veil (khimar) on girls under the age of six, and the banning of photography to cover up “brainwashing” operations funded by suspicious sources.
• The “Moderate Faces” Plan: Exposing the attempt by the “Minister of Endowments” and the Brotherhood wing to whitewash their faces for the coming stage, in order to plant a “deep state” that ensures the survival of the international organization within the joints of the Syrian state, using Ahmed al-Sharaa as a temporary facade.
“The Red Lines for Syrian Sovereignty”
Nullity of Investments and Long-term Agreements:
The Syrian National Forces affirm that no temporary authority or “indeed authority” (unelected) has the right to sign long-term investment agreements or cede an inch of Syrian territory. Any international bet on investments conducted through “appointed parliaments” or “formal structures” is a bet on “tilting at windmills.” No agreement shall gain legitimacy except through:
• A permanent constitution approved by the Syrian people.
• An elected parliament and a legitimate president who unites the fragmented geography.
The Impossibility of Transitional Justice under the Shadow of Perpetrators:
It is impossible to leapfrog the rights of victims through “formal committees,” whether international ones affiliated with the United Nations or national ones, or through protocol visits—to countries intended to deceive and mislead them regarding the reality inside Syria. An authority that has recently committed crimes in the Coast and Suwayda and possesses a criminal history cannot establish “true justice.” Any attempt to make this model succeed by “impoverishing the people” is an attempt doomed to historical failure.
The Equation (Al-Sharaa = The Muslim Brotherhood):
The continuation of “Ahmed al-Sharaa” as a facade for the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood is a repetition of the “Assad and Iran” model. Just as Assad fell to get rid of Iranian dependency, the fall of the Brotherhood is the mandatory passage for the fall of Al-Sharaa. This equation is what will drive Syria toward true stability, and any circumvention of it only prolongs the suffering of the people.
Conclusion: “National Sovereignty or Organized Chaos”
The continued marginalization of independent national competencies (and the besieging of their livelihoods) grants cross-border currents an opportunity to mislead international decision-makers. Stability is not built with “states within the state.” The independent national forces, stemming from their steadfastness and vision, will redraw the reality of Syria in a way that achieves the aspirations of the people and Syria’s geopolitical position, away from “false peace” deals made at the expense of the identity of future generations and the extremism of schools. We are not against peace according to the principle of peaceful coexistence, international law, and respect for the will of peoples; however, it must reflect on the Syrian people and intersect with their interests through a new approach, not against them, nor that they should pay its price and remain under a mandate.
Mr. Qutaiba Qasim al-Arab
President of the National Council for Human Rights
Syrian national sovereignty, National Council for Human Rights, Qutaiba Qasim Al-Arab, Combating Terrorism 2026, Muslim Brotherhood Organization, Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham, Regional Security, Ideological Despotism, Transitional Justice in Syria, Independent National Competencies.
Syrian National Sovereignty, National Council for Human Rights, Qutaiba Qasim Al-Arab, Counter-Terrorism Strategy 2026, Muslim Brotherhood, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), Regional Security, Ideological Extremism, Transitional Justice Syria, Independent National Competencies.
Featured with your friends:
